Fuel Economy and CO2 Emissions
A
Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – with FFVs
Miles per gallon
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B
Ford U.S. CO2 Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – with FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO2 Emissions)
Grams per mile
|
C
European CO2 Performance, Passenger Vehicles – Percent of 1995 Base
1995 base = 100 percent
Percent
|
Ford
Jaguar
Land Rover
Volvo
|
NOTES TO THE DATA
Chart A
See the Climate Change and Environment sections for a discussion of our Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) performance. For the 2007 model year the CAFE of our cars and trucks increased 5.9 percent. Preliminary data for the 2008 model year show a 0.7 percent improvement in CAFE compared to 2007, with a 1.3 percent improvement for cars and a 4.0 percent improvement for trucks. Improvement is reflected by increasing miles per gallon. The percentage improvement in CAFE for cars and trucks combined is lower than the respective percentages for both cars and trucks primarily because the ratio of trucks to cars manufactured is projected to increase from 2007 to 2008. Also, the CAFE figure is calculated based on volume of vehicles manufactured as well as the fuel economy of each individual vehicle.
Chart B
See the Climate Change section for a discussion of our CO2 emissions performance. Improvement is reflected by decreasing grams per mile.
Chart C
Official EU data. Jaguar performance did not improve compared to 2005 and 2006 due to model mix.