skip navigation
back to Ford.com

Fuel Economy and CO2 Emissions

TABLES on This Page

  1. Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – with FFVs
  2. Ford U.S. CO2 Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – with FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO2 Emissions)
  3. European CO2 Performance, Passenger Vehicles – Percent of 1995 Base

VIEWING THIS DATA

Would you prefer to view the data as charts?

VIEW DATA CHARTS

A

Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – with FFVs

Miles per gallon
  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Cars (domestic and import) 27.9 27.9 26.7 28.6 28.2 29.1
Trucks 20.7 21.3 21.0 21.6 21.1 22.3
Combined car and truck fleet 23.2 23.6 22.8 24.1 23.8 25.3
See notes to the data
top

B

Ford U.S. CO2 Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – with FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO2 Emissions)

Grams per mile
  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
  381 375 387 368 371 352
See notes to the data
top

C

European CO2 Performance, Passenger Vehicles – Percent of 1995 Base

1995 base = 100 percent
Percent
  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Ford 83 82 80 78 78 78
Jaguar 79 77 63 62 66 67
Land Rover 86 87 86 88 89 86
Volvo 88 91 89 87 86 84
See notes to the data
top

NOTES TO THE DATA

Table A

See the Climate Change and Environment sections for a discussion of our Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) performance. For the 2007 model year the CAFE of our cars and trucks increased 5.9 percent. Preliminary data for the 2008 model year show a 0.7 percent improvement in CAFE compared to 2007, with a 1.3 percent improvement for cars and a 4.0 percent improvement for trucks. Improvement is reflected by increasing miles per gallon. The percentage improvement in CAFE for cars and trucks combined is lower than the respective percentages for both cars and trucks primarily because the ratio of trucks to cars manufactured is projected to increase from 2007 to 2008. Also, the CAFE figure is calculated based on volume of vehicles manufactured as well as the fuel economy of each individual vehicle.

Table B

See the Climate Change section for a discussion of our CO2 emissions performance. Improvement is reflected by decreasing grams per mile.

Table C

Official EU data. Jaguar performance did not improve compared to 2005 and 2006 due to model mix.