Ford’s European operations pioneered the development of the Product Sustainability Index (PSI), a holistic Design for Sustainability approach that incorporates societal and economic aspects as well as environmental aspects1 into our lifecycle design approach.
Ford’s PSI tracks eight product attributes identified as key sustainability elements of a vehicle: lifecycle global warming potential (mainly carbon dioxide emissions); lifecycle air-quality potential (other air emissions); the use of sustainable materials (recycled and renewable materials); vehicle interior air quality (including allergy certification from TÜV Rheinland, a product-testing organization); exterior noise impact (drive-by noise); safety, as measured by the European New Car Assessment Program (including for occupants and also pedestrians); mobility capability (seat and luggage capacity relative to vehicle size); and lifecycle ownership costs (full costs for the customer over the first three years).
Since 2002 we have been applying the PSI as a sustainability management tool in the development of all of our major new European vehicles. The PSI process was used to develop the 2006 Ford S-MAX and Galaxy, as well as the 2007 Mondeo, 2008 Kuga, 2009 Fiesta and 2011 Focus. The Focus is the first Ford vehicle developed using the PSI system that is being sold globally. And, the PSI assessment of the Focus was the first PSI study conducted jointly by Ford of Europe and Ford North America. As a result of using the PSI assessment system, all of these models have shown improvements in environmental, social and/or economic performance when compared to the previous models. The chart below shows specific performance and areas of improvement for each model. The PSI will be used on all future products developed by Ford of Europe. Detailed reports on the PSI analysis for these vehicles can be downloaded from Ford of Europe’s website.
In 2012, we applied the PSI tool to various propulsion technologies for a Focus vehicle type. We learned that for a battery electric vehicle (BEV) variant, the carbon footprint of the battery is only about 10 percent of the overall lifecycle CO2 emissions of a modern gasoline Focus. The carbon footprint of the electricity source used to charge the electric vehicle determines whether or not the Focus BEV is superior to a conventional Focus. In our study, we assumed the Focus BEV used electricity from sources below 400 g of lifecycle CO2/kWh – such as the electricity currently used in California, Norway, Switzerland and France. Based on this study, we found that the most cost-efficient, low-CO2 vehicles for customers are the Focus variants powered by the EcoBoost® engine or advanced diesel engines. In 2013, we will continue in this study by assessing plug-in hybrid vehicles.
Emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases from raw material extraction to material, part and vehicle production, driving period (150,000 km, incl. air conditioning) and final recycling/recovery (i.e., full vehicle lifecycle, cradle-to-cradle)
Performance* | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 39 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Similar |
2006 Ford Galaxy 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 40 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Similar |
2007 Ford Mondeo 2.0L TDCi Diesel with DPF | 37 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | 37 metric tons CO2 equivalent | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | 21 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | 30 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6 L, Gasoline | 32 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6 L, Diesel | 27 metric tons CO2 equivalent | Better |
*1 metric ton = 1,000 kg
Summer smog-related emissions from raw material extraction to material, part and vehicle production, driving period (150,000 km, incl. air conditioning) and final recycling/recovery (i.e., full vehicle lifecycle, cradle-to-cradle)
Performance | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 37 kg ethene equivalent | Similar |
2006 Ford Galaxy, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 37 kg ethene equivalent | Similar |
2007 Ford Mondeo, 2.0-L TDCi Diesel with DPF | 35 kg ethene equivalent | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | 35 kg ethene equivalent | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | 22 kg ethene equivalent | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | 32 kg ethene equivalent | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6 L, Gasoline | 30 kg ethene equivalent | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6L Diesel | 25 kg ethene equivalent | Better |
Use of recycled and natural materials
Performance | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 18 kg of non-metals | Better |
2006 Ford Galaxy 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 18 kg of non-metals | Better |
2007 Ford Mondeo 2.0L TDCi Diesel with DPF | 7.5% of non-metals | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | 6% of non-metals | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | 8.5% of non-metals | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | 9% of non-metals | Better |
Performance | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | Substance management, TÜV-tested pollen filter efficiency and allergy-tested label | Better |
2006 Ford Galaxy, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | Substance management, TÜV-tested pollen filter efficiency and allergy-tested label | Better |
2007 Ford Mondeo, 2.0L TDCi Diesel with DPF | Substance management, TÜV-tested interior and pollen filter efficiency | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | Substance management, TÜV-tested interior and pollen filter efficiency | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | Substance management, TÜV-tested interior and pollen filter efficiency | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | Substance management, TÜV-tested interior and pollen filter efficiency | Better |
Decibel level weighted to human ear dB(A)
Performance | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 71 dB(A) | Better |
2006 Ford Galaxy, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 71 dB(A) | Better |
2007 Ford Mondeo 2.0L, TDCi Diesel with DPF | 69 dB(A) | Similar |
2008 Ford Kuga | 72 dB(A) | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | 69 dB(A) | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | 72 dB(A) | Similar |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6L Gasoline | 66 dB(A) | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6L Diesel | 68 dB(A) | Better |
Complex method, structural stability, occupant safety, and pedestrian safety; active safety elements, etc., including European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP) stars
Performance | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | Euro NCAP safety rating: 5 stars for adult occupant protection, 4 stars for child protection and 2 stars for pedestrian protection | Better |
2006 Ford Galaxy, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | Euro NCAP safety rating: 5 stars for adult occupant protection, 4 stars for child protection and 2 stars for pedestrian protection | Better |
2007 Ford Mondeo, 2.0L TDCi Diesel with DPF | Euro NCAP safety rating: 5 stars for adult occupant protection, 4 stars for child protection and 2 stars for pedestrian protection | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | Euro NCAP safety rating: 5 stars for adult occupant protection, 4 stars for child occupant protection and 3 stars for pedestrian protection | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | 5-star Euro NCAP rating for adult occupant safety; electronic stability control available for all versions | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | 5-star Euro NCAP rating for adult occupant safety; electronic stability control available for all versions | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, Gasoline and Diesel | 5-star overall safety rating, plus 4 Euro NCAP Advanced rewards for Active City Stop, Lane Keeping Aid, Forward Alert and Driver Alert | Better |
Mobility service (including seats, luggage) to vehicle size; measured as vehicle shadow in m2 and luggage areas in liters
Performance | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 10.25 m2 shadow area, 1,171 liter luggage, 5 seats | Better |
2006 Ford Galaxy, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | 10.4 m2 shadow area, 435 liter luggage, 7 seats | Similar |
2007 Ford Mondeo, 2.0L TDCi Diesel with DPF | 9 m2 shadow area, 530 liter luggage, 5 seats | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | 9.5 m2 shadow area, 410 liter luggage, 5 seats | No previous model – among best in class |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | 7.5 m2 shadow area, 295 liter luggage compartment | Better |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Gasoline | 7.5 m2 shadow area, 295 liter luggage compartment | Similar |
2011 Ford Focus, Gasoline and Diesel | 8.76 m2 shadow area, 363 liter luggage compartment | Similar |
Sum of vehicle price and three years’ service (fuel cost, maintenance cost, taxation) minus residual value
Performance* | Better/Worse than Previous Model | |
---|---|---|
2006 Ford S-MAX, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | Approx. €22,100 | Better |
2006 Ford Galaxy, 2.0L TDCi with DPF | Approx. €23,200 | Better |
2007 Ford Mondeo, 2.0L TDCi Diesel with DPF | Approx. €18,300 | Better |
2008 Ford Kuga | Approx. €19,100 | No previous model |
2009 Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, Diesel | Approx. €13,000 | Similar |
2009 Ford Fiesta, Petrol | Approx. €11,000 | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6L Gasoline | Approx. €16,400 | Better |
2011 Ford Focus, 1.6L Diesel | Approx. €16,700 | Better |
*No guarantee that the costs reflect market conditions (in particular dependent on assumed differences in residual value and running cost).
Both Ford’s own internal assessments and external assessments have found the PSI to be an effective lifecycle assessment and design tool. An external study, conducted by experts in lifecycle science and sustainability, found the PSI to be a design and analysis step that provides a full sustainability assessment and meets the requirements of ISO 14040, the international lifecycle assessment standard. The PSI assessments of the 2006 S-MAX and Galaxy vehicles were certified against the ISO rules for Lifecycle Assessment. This certification process also verified the overall PSI methodology used for all subsequent PSI-developed models.