Ford’s Goals, Commitments and Status
This table summarizes Ford’s goals, commitments, targets and progress in our material issue areas and other important performance areas.
- KEY
- ON TRACK
- IN PROCESS
- NOT ON TRACK
Sustaining Ford
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Execute our “ONE Ford” transformational plan to create a leaner, more-efficient global enterprise. | Continued to strengthen our balance sheet, reducing our Automotive debt by $14.5 billion. This included the full $7 billion prepayment of our debt obligations for the UAW’s independent health care trust. | |
Achieve profitability in 2011. | Full-year 2010 net income was our highest in more than a decade. We achieved positive Automotive gross cash net of debt earlier than we anticipated. Our 2010 financial results exceeded our expectations. | |
Align capacity to demand. | Continued to globalize vehicle platforms that can be adapted to meet specific regional needs and to produce the vehicles that customers want. Retooled facilities that previously built large trucks and SUVs to instead manufacture smaller, more energy-efficient vehicles. Ended production of Mercury vehicles. | |
Reverse the trend of losing money on small car production in the U.S. | Boosted production of smaller-sized vehicles in North America and globally. Improving costs to competitive levels. Enhancing revenues through class-leading fuel economy, safety performance and quality. | |
Develop partnerships and projects to explore solutions to urban and rural mobility challenges. | Began looking at new mobility options through an “ecosystem” lens that puts vehicles in a broader transportation context. Developed a new project called SUMURR (Sustainable Urban Mobility with Uncompromised Rural Reach), with a pilot in Chennai, India. |
Climate Change
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Products | ||
Do our share to stabilize carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere at 450 ppm, the level generally accepted to avoid the most serious effects of climate change. |
|
|
Ensure that every all-new or redesigned vehicle we introduce will be best in class or among the best in class for fuel economy in its segment. | Followed through on this commitment with vehicles introduced in all our regions, and we will continue to do so in future product launches. | |
Manufacturing | ||
Continuously improve energy efficiency; 2010 and 2011 goals are a 3 percent improvement. | Met commitment to improve facility energy-efficiency emissions by 3 percent in 2010 vs. 2009: improved global energy efficiency by 5.6 percent. Improved energy efficiency in North America by 14.4 percent compared to 2006 baseline. | |
Reduce global facility CO2 emissions per vehicle by 30 percent by 2025. | New target. Reduced 2010 CO2 emissions by 5.6 percent per vehicle compared to 2009. | |
EU Emission Trading Scheme: Ensure compliance with Trading Scheme requirements, including third-party verification. | Continued to comply with the Trading Scheme requirements. | |
Chicago Climate Exchange: Reduce Ford’s North American facility CO2 emissions by 6 percent between 2000 and 2010 as verified by third-party auditors. | Achieved this goal. | |
Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers: Reduce industry-wide U.S. facility GHG emissions by 10 percent per vehicle produced between 2002 and 2012. | On track to meet this commitment. | |
Voluntarily report GHG emissions. | Continued to voluntarily report facility CO2 emissions to national emissions registries or other authorities in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Mexico, the Philippines and the U.S. | |
Supply Chain | ||
Better understand the carbon footprint of Ford’s supply chain to inform the development of a broad-based carbon management approach for our supply chain. |
|
† Please see Sue Cischke’s letter for a discussion of our CO2-reduction goal for North America and Europe.
Water
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
In 2000, set target of 3 percent year-over-year water use reductions; aiming for global water reduction of 5 percent per vehicle for 2011, compared to 2010. | Decreased water use per vehicle by 49 percent from 2000 to 2010. | |
Develop new water approach. | In 2010, set up new team to review water issues in a more holistic way. Became a founding responder to Water Disclosure, a Carbon Disclosure Project initiative. |
Supply Chain
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Overall goal: Leverage Ford’s complex, global supply chain to make a positive impact in the markets in which we do business. |
|
|
Collaborate with key production suppliers to align policies and practices to protect working conditions and responsible environmental management. | Twenty percent of our strategic suppliers have met all three Ford milestones: they have codes of conduct in place that are aligned with international standards and supported by robust management systems governing their own operations and their supply chain. | |
Facilitate development of an industry-wide approach to ensuring sound working conditions and respect for human rights in the supply chain. |
|
Vehicle Safety and Driver-Assist Technologies
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Design and manufacture vehicles that achieve high levels of vehicle safety for a wide range of people over the broad spectrum of real-world conditions. |
|
|
Meet or exceed all regulatory requirements for safety. | Continue to meet this goal every year. Ford’s internal Safety Design Guidelines and Public Domain Guidelines go beyond stringent regulatory requirements. | |
Provide information, educational programs and advanced technologies to assist in promoting safe driving practices. | Invested an additional $1 million to expand the Ford Driving Skills for Life (FDSFL) program in the U.S. from 9 to 15 states. In the FDSFL program, included modules on avoiding distracted driving. Offered MyKey®, allowing parents to program a key for their teenagers that limits certain features, such as top speed and audio volume. Unveiled Curve Control, a technology that senses – and responds – when the driver takes a curve too quickly. | |
Play a leadership role in accident research. | Launched research aimed to create one of the world’s first digital human body models of a child. The model could someday serve as a digital “dummy” for computer crash testing. In Europe, joined with 29 partner organizations to take part in “interactIVe,” a research project that seeks to support the development and implementation of active safety systems. Maintained major research alliances with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Michigan, Northwestern University and more than 100 universities worldwide; safety is a central thrust of this work. | |
Play a leadership role in research and development relating to “intelligent” vehicles. | Doubled our investment in intelligent vehicles, formed a new 20-member task force of scientists and engineers to explore the technology’s broader possibilities, and will become the first automaker to build prototype vehicles for demonstrations across the U.S. Took part in collaborative research in the U.S. (via the Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership) and Europe (via the “simTD” and DRIVE2X projects) to test intelligent vehicle technologies. |
Other Important Issues
Environment (Non-Climate and Non-Water)
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Products | ||
Expand use of the Product Sustainability Index (PSI) and Design for Sustainability principles in product development. |
|
|
Increase the use of recycled, renewable and lightweight materials. |
|
|
Increase the use of and certification for allergen-free and air-quality-friendly interior materials. | Established global design guidelines for allergy-free materials and in-vehicle air filtration that are being migrated across product lines. | |
Reduce the use of substances of concern. | As of 2009, all Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles in the U.S. are mercury-free with the exception of the Lincoln Town Car, which uses mercury in its high-intensity discharge headlamps. Have eliminated the use of lead wheel weights in North America and Europe. | |
Manufacturing | ||
Reduce water use. | (See Water section of Goals Table.) | |
Reduce CO2 emissions. | (See Climate Change section of Goals Table.) | |
Reduce landfill disposal, with 2010 and 2011 targets of 10 percent reduction per vehicle per year. | Reduced landfill disposal in 2010 by 12.4 percent per vehicle compared to 2009. | |
In 2010, maintain VOC emissions from painting at North American Assembly plants at 24 grams/square meter or less. In 2011, maintain VOC emissions from painting at North American Assembly plants at 23 grams/square meter or less. |
2010 VOC emissions at North American Assembly plants were 21.6 grams/square meter. |
Workplace Health and Safety
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Safety | ||
Fatalities target is always zero. | Experienced one employee fatality and two contractor fatalities during 2010. | |
Serious injuries target is zero; objective was to be competitive with industry by 2010. | Reduced total from 128 to 108. Failed to reach aggressive 50 percent reduction target. Have active interventions in place in all regions. | |
Overall goal is to obtain competitive DART levels and drive continuous improvement; specific targets are set by business units yearly for five years into the future. | Continued the strong continuous improvement trend on overall injury rates in 2010. | |
Health | ||
Improve focus on employee personal health through access to health risk appraisal and health promotion programs. | Have active personal health promotion programs in place in most regions. Deployed common global metrics and developed plans to implement in remaining countries. Employee participation on health-risk appraisals now included as a core component of U.S. health benefit programs. |
Quality
Goal/Commitment | 2010 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Become global quality leader; strive to be best in class in every phase of vehicle development, from design to pre-delivery. | Continued to improve Ford quality in 2010. In the U.S., Ford tied with Honda for the fewest number of “things gone wrong” (TGW) after three months in service among all full-line automakers. Ford also reduced TGW in Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa, and South America.‡ | |
Launch new small global cars with the industry’s best quality ever, at fewer than 800 TGW per 1,000 vehicles in the first 90 days of ownership. Continue to improve initial quality and long-term durability by reducing TGW and warranty costs in every vehicle program. |
|
|
Continue to improve customer satisfaction with our vehicles and sales and service divisions. | Improved overall customer satisfaction at three months in service. Improved sales satisfaction in both the U.S. and Europe. Service satisfaction remained the same in the U.S. and improved in Europe. |
‡ “Things gone wrong” is measured as part of the Global Quality Research Survey (GQRS), which is conducted quarterly for Ford by the RDA Group, a market research and consulting firm.
- Overview
- Economy Data
- Environment Data
- Society Data