Ford’s Goals, Commitments and Status
This table summarizes Ford’s goals, commitments, targets and progress in our material issue areas and other important performance areas. Please see the data sections for our complete data reporting and data notes.
- KEY
- ON TRACK
- IN PROCESS
- NOT ON TRACK
Financial Health
Goal/Commitment | 2011 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Execute our “ONE Ford” transformational plan to create a leaner, more-efficient global enterprise. |
|
|
Achieve profitability in 2012. |
|
|
Align capacity to demand. |
|
|
Reverse the trend of losing money on small-car production in the U.S. |
|
|
Set new goals under “Blueprint for Mobility” in early 2012. |
|
|
Quality | ||
Overall goal: Deliver best-in-the-world quality; strive to be best in class in every phase of vehicle development, from design to pre-delivery. |
|
|
Continue to reduce “things gone wrong” (TGW) and warranty spending. |
|
|
Continue to improve customer satisfaction with our vehicles and sales and service divisions. |
|
Climate Change and the Environment
Goal/Commitment | 2011 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Climate Change – Products | ||
Do our share to stabilize carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere at 450 ppm, the level that many scientists, businesses and government agencies believe may avoid the most serious effects of climate change. | Reduced fleet-average CO2 emissions from our 2011 model year for U.S. new vehicles by 9 percent compared to the 2007 model year. Reduced fleet-average CO2 emissions for European vehicles by 8.5 percent from the 2006 to 2010 calendar years. | |
Ensure that every all-new or redesigned vehicle we introduce will be best in class or among the best in class for fuel economy in its segment. | Followed through on this commitment with vehicles introduced in all our regions, and will continue to do so in future product launches. | |
Climate Change - Manufacturing | ||
Continuously improve energy efficiency including a specific goal to improve North America manufacturing energy efficiency 3 percent from 2010 to 2011. | Met commitment to improve facility energy-efficiency emissions by 3 percent in 2011 vs. 2010. In fact, improved global facility energy efficiency by 10 percent in 2011 vs. 2010. Improved energy efficiency in North America by 2.6 percent compared to 2010 baseline. | |
Reduce global facility CO2 emissions per vehicle by 30 percent by 2025 compared to a 2010 baseline. | Reduced 2011 CO2 emissions by 8 percent per vehicle compared to 2010. | |
Reduce average facility energy use per vehicle globally by 25 percent between 2011 and 2016. | New goal in 2011 | |
Environment - Products | ||
Expand use of the Product Sustainability Index (PSI) and Design for Sustainability principles in product development. |
|
|
Increase the use of recycled, renewable and lightweight materials. Use soy foam seat cushions and backs on 100 percent of Ford vehicles manufactured in North America. Use at least 25 percent recycled content in seat fabrics on all new and redesigned vehicles sold in North America. |
|
|
Increase the use of and certification for allergy-tested and air-quality-friendly interior materials. | Established global design guidelines for allergy-free materials and in-vehicle air filtration that are being migrated across product lines. | |
Environment - Manufacturing | ||
Reduce water use. | (See Water section of Goals Table.) | |
Reduce CO2 emissions. | (See Climate Change section of Goals Table.) | |
Reduce landfill disposal, with 2011 and 2012 targets of 10 percent reduction per vehicle per year. | Reduced landfill disposal in 2011 by more than 19 percent per vehicle compared to 2010. | |
In 2012, maintain VOC emissions from painting at North American Assembly plants at 23 grams/square meter or less. | Achieved 2011 VOC emissions at North American Assembly plants of 20.4 grams/square meter. |
Water
Goal/Commitment | 2011 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Cut the amount of water used to make each vehicle by 30 percent globally by 2015, compared to 2009. |
|
Vehicle Safety
Goal/Commitment | 2011 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Design and manufacture vehicles that achieve high levels of performance in public domain testing and offer innovative safety and driver assist technologies. |
|
|
Meet or exceed all regulatory requirements for safety. | Continue to meet this goal every year. Ford’s internal Safety Design Guidelines and other internal standards go beyond stringent regulatory requirements. Ford often establishes internal standards on emerging issues long before public domain or regulatory standards are adopted. | |
Provide information, educational programs and advanced technologies to assist in promoting safe driving practices. | Continued to invest in Ford Driving Skills for Life (FDSFL) program, focusing on teen drivers in the U.S. and first-time drivers of all ages in our Asia Pacific markets. The program includes modules on avoiding distracted driving. Offered an upgraded MyKey® system, allowing parents to program a key for their teenagers that can limit certain features (such as maximum speed and audio volume), lock out the radio when the safety belt is not buckled and invoke a Do Not Disturb feature, sending incoming phone calls and text messages to a synced phone’s mailbox. For the 2012 model year, MyKey is available on nearly all Ford Motor Company retail vehicles in North America, and its availability has expanded to other regions. | |
Play a leadership role in vehicle safety research. | Continued involvement in interactIVe, a research project in Europe with 29 partner organizations that seeks to support the development and implementation of accident avoidance systems. Maintained major research alliances with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Michigan, Northwestern University and more than 100 universities worldwide; safety is a central thrust of this work. | |
Play a leadership role in research and development relating to connected vehicles. | Continued to take part in collaborative, active-safety research in Europe known as Safe Intelligent Mobility – Test Field Germany (simTD) to investigate vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications in a large-scale field operational test. Contributed to the European harmonization and standardization of wireless communication systems and applications within the framework of the DRIVing implementation and Evaluation of C2X communication technology (DRIVE C2X). Continued to take part in collaborative research in the U.S. via the Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (CAMP) and Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium (VIIC). |
- *Historic totals include all brands and entities owned and controlled by the manufacturer during the 2006–2012 calendar years. For Ford Motor Company this includes Ford, Lincoln, Mercury and – through 2010 model year – Volvo. Totals do not include Mazda.
Supply Chain
Goal/Commitment | 2011 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Overall goal: Leverage Ford’s complex, global supply chain to make a positive impact in the markets in which we do business. |
|
|
Facilitate development of an industry-wide approach to ensuring sound working conditions and respect for human rights in the supply chain. |
|
|
Better understand the carbon footprint of Ford’s supply chain to inform the development of a broad-based carbon management approach for our supply chain. |
|
Health & Safety
Goal/Commitment | 2011 Progress | On Track? |
---|---|---|
Health | ||
Improve focus on employee personal health through access to health risk appraisal and health promotion programs. |
|
|
Safety | ||
Fatalities target is always zero. |
|
|
Serious injuries target is zero; overall goal is to attain industry competitive lost-time and DART levels and drive continuous improvement; specific targets are set by business units yearly for five years into the future. |
|