Consumer demand for more fuel-efficient and cleaner vehicles continues to grow. Ford is taking a multi-pronged approach to meeting this demand. We have committed to improving the overall fuel economy of our entire fleet. We recently announced that, beginning with the 2010 model year, all of our new vehicles will be best in class or among the best in class for fuel economy in their segment. As of May 2009, all of our 2010 model year vehicles meet this commitment; many of our 2009 vehicles also meet this commitment. For example:1
To accomplish our fuel-economy goal, we are focused in the near term on implementing the most cost-effective fuel-efficiency technologies across a large volume of our vehicles and on introducing new products that offer improved fuel efficiency without compromising style or performance. In 2009, for example, we began implementing the EcoBoost™ engine, a key technology in our fuel-efficiency strategy that uses gasoline turbocharged direct-injection technology. EcoBoost will deliver up to 20 percent better fuel economy, 15 percent fewer carbon dioxide emissions and superior driving performance compared to larger-displacement engines.8 Because EcoBoost is affordable and can be applied to existing gasoline engines, we can implement it across our vehicle fleet, bringing fuel-efficiency benefits to a wider range of our customers.
The EcoBoost V-6 will be introduced on the 2010 model year Lincoln MKS, Lincoln MKT, Ford Taurus SHO and Ford Flex. Thanks largely to the EcoBoost technology, both the V-6 Ford Flex and the V-6 Lincoln MKT will be among the leaders for fuel economy in their respective segments. By 2013, Ford will have EcoBoost V-6 and I-4 engines in approximately 1.3 million vehicles per year globally. In North America, 90 percent of Ford's nameplates will offer the technology.
We are continuing to develop and introduce advanced technologies that improve fuel efficiency, reduce emissions and reduce dependence on foreign oil. In the mid- to long term, we will implement these advanced technologies as they become cost effective.
We are also responding to the increasing demand for fuel-efficient vehicles by rebalancing our portfolio to include more small and medium-sized vehicles. We are also working to improve the profitability of our small car offerings, so we can expand our small car lineup while continuing to increase our financial viability.
You can read about our other short-, mid- and long-term plans to improve fuel economy in our Sustainable Technologies and Alternative Fuels Plan.
To meet the demand for more fuel-efficient vehicles and increase our financial health, we are balancing the portfolio of vehicles we sell to better represent consumer demand for a variety of vehicle sizes and capabilities. We are leveraging our global product strengths to deliver six new world-class small and medium-sized vehicles to the United States over the next four years. This will enable our car and crossover product segment mix to increase from 48 percent to 60 percent and result in volume and share growth.
We are targeting sales leadership in "people movers" and crossovers by adding new vehicles (such as the Ford Flex) and redefining existing vehicles (such as the Ford Explorer). We will have significantly reduced our truck, van and SUV product mix from 52 percent to 40 percent in the next three years. In order to realize a balanced portfolio, we are increasing our investment allocation in cars and crossovers from 59 percent to 82 percent of our total investment.
Although we believe that the shift to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles is permanent, trucks, vans and SUVs will continue to be an important part of our North American market offerings, in order to meet our customers' needs. We intend to maintain our leadership position in these segments by focusing our investment on new fuel-efficient vehicles, such as the new Ford Transit, as well as all-new powertrains with advanced technology.
As consumer demand for smaller vehicles continues to increase, we need to both provide the vehicles people want and provide them profitably in order to remain a sustainable business. As part of our financial stabilization plan, we will reverse the decades-long trend of losing money on the production of small cars in the United States. To accomplish this, and secure our ability to continue to produce all types of vehicles in the United States, we are taking the following actions:
The new Ford Fiesta is an example of how we are increasing small-car profitability and increasing our small-car offerings, without compromising on quality, safety, style or features. The Fiesta, which went on sale in Europe in 2008 and will be available globally by 2010, is the first major product to come out of our new global product development process. Leveraging and integrating our global operations is one key element in making small cars more profitably.
All fuel economy numbers for U.S. vehicles are EPA estimates. The vehicles listed below are best in class for fuel economy based on EPA segments unless otherwise noted. Alternative segments are used where EPA segments do not provide a detailed breakdown of vehicle types. For example, the EPA only uses one category for SUVs that includes crossovers, compact SUVs and large SUVs.
Midsize sedan segment based on the R.L. Polk segment definition.
Based on the segment definition of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The class in this case is full-size non-hybrid pickups under 8,500 lbs. gross vehicle weight rating.
The Fiesta ECOnetic is only available in Europe. The fuel economy numbers are calculated according to the European Fuel Economy Directive EU 93/116/EEC, which uses European drive cycles. They differ from fuel economy calculations developed in the U.S. or other regions of the world. However, the mpg figures are calculated using the U.S.-sized gallon, which is 20 percent smaller than a European gallon.
When fuel economy is calculated as miles per gallon, EcoBoost delivers up to 20 percent better fuel economy compared to larger-displacement engines. When fuel economy is calculated in liters per 100 km, as it is in most of Europe, EcoBoost delivers up to 15 percent better fuel economy. The benefits of EcoBoost are the same in each case; the difference is only in the units used in the calculations. This is because the conversion between miles per gallon, which measures distance traveled per unit of fuel consumed (wherein more is better), and liters per 100 km, which measures fuel consumed per unit of distance traveled (wherein less is better), is a reciprocal or inverse proportion. Therefore, the resulting figures are different even though the actual benefit received is the same.