skip navigation
/ford/06-05-2010/back to Ford.com

A

Percent of Nameplates Achieving 3-star or better in Rollover NCAP

Percent
  2007 2008
Ford 100 96
Toyota 100 100
GM 100 100

B

Percent of Nameplates Achieving 4-star/4-star Frontal NCAP or Better

Percent
  2007 2008
Ford 100 100
Toyota 100 100
GM 83 92

C

Percent of Nameplates Achieving 5-star/5-star Frontal NCAP

Percent
  2007 2008
Ford 57 63
Toyota 40 50
GM 58 60

D

Percent of Nameplates Achieving 4-star/4-star or Better in LINCAP

Percent
  2007 2008
Ford 92 100
Toyota 87 90
GM 90 91

E

Percent of Nameplates Achieving 5-star/5-star or Better LINCAP

Percent
  2007 2008
Ford 60 61
Toyota 53 65
GM 50 59

F

IIHS Frontal Offset – Percent of Nameplates Achieving "Good" Rating

Percent
  2007 2008
Ford 79 83
Toyota 100 95
GM 73 74

G

Number of IIHS Top Safety Picks by Manufacturer

Number of vehicles
  2007 2008
Ford 6 8
Toyota 0 2
GM 2 4

H

Euro NCAP Results 2005-7

Adult Occupant Protection Points

  Industry
Low
Industry
High
Industry
Average
Ford results
Small Family Cars 19.09 36.83 30.69 Ford Focus: 35.46
Large Family Cars 26.53 36.16 33.40 Ford Mondeo: 35.13
MPVs 19.83 35.77 30.43 Ford Galaxy: 35.40, Ford S-MAX: 35.77

I

U.S. Safety Recalls

Number of safety recalls
  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
  16 16 21 16 11 15

Number of units
  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
  2,323,000 3,405,000 5,034,000 6,005,000 1,737,000 5,534,000

NOTES TO THE DATA

Chart A, Chart B, Chart C, Chart D and Chart E

U.S. New Car Assessment Program

Government star ratings are part of the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) of the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). In NHTSA’s frontal crash rating tests, vehicles with belted front-seat test dummies are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 mph, which is equivalent to a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph. Since the test is designed to reflect a crash between two similar vehicles, one can meaningfully compare vehicles from the same weight class (within +/- 250 lbs) when looking at frontal crash test ratings.

Instruments measure the force of the impact to each test dummy’s head, chest and legs. NHTSA uses the readings from these instruments to estimate the chance that a real occupant would sustain a serious injury in the tested frontal crash. A serious injury is defined as one that requires immediate hospitalization and may be life-threatening.

For side crash ratings, belted test dummies are placed in the driver seat and rear passenger seat (driver’s side). The side crash rating is designed to represent an intersection-type collision with a 3,015 lb barrier moving at 38.5 mph into a standing vehicle. The moving barrier is covered with material that has “give” to replicate the front of a vehicle. Since all rated vehicles are impacted by the same size barrier, it is possible to compare all vehicles with each other when looking at side crash protection ratings. Instruments measure the force of impact to each dummy’s head, neck, chest and pelvis. Side crash star ratings indicate the chance of a serious chest injury for the driver, front seat passenger and the rear seat passenger (first and second row occupants).

What do the stars mean? Chance of serious injury
  Frontal Crash Rating Side Crash Rating
/ford/06-05-2010/5 star 10 percent or less 5 percent or less
/ford/06-05-2010/4 star 11–20 percent 6–10 percent
/ford/06-05-2010/3 star 21–35 percent 11–20 percent
/ford/06-05-2010/2 star 36–45 percent 21–25 percent
/ford/06-05-2010/1 star 46 percent or greater 26 percent or greater

For more information, go to www.nhtsa.dot.gov. Data are for the model year noted.

Ford believes the NHTSA rollover resistance metric is flawed as it does not include a measure of the benefits of electronic stability control systems (ESC). NHTSA's studies have shown the benefits of ESC systems and their potential to improve vehicle stability. Ford believes ESC equipped vehicles should be credited in the resistance to rollover NCAP.

Chart F

IIHS Frontal Offset Evaluation

In the 40 mph offset test of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), 40 percent of the total width of a vehicle strikes a barrier on the driver's side. The forces in the test are similar to those involved in a frontal offset crash between two vehicles of the same weight, each going just less than 40 mph. Test results can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Like full-width crash test results, the results of offset tests cannot be used to compare vehicle performance across weight classes.

Based on a vehicle's performance in three areas evaluated in the frontal offset crash tested - structural performance, injury measures and restraints/dummy kinematics - the IIHS assigns a vehicle an overall crashworthiness measure of Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Poor. For more information, go to www.iihs.org.

Chart G

To earn a Top Safety Pick from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), a vehicle must receive a rating of "good" in offset frontal impact, side impact and rear impact evaluations, and offer electronic stability control. Top Safety Picks are the best vehicle choices for safety within size categories. 2005 (2006 model year) was the first year IIHS issued Top Safety Picks.

Chart H

Adult Occupant ratings range from 0 to 5 stars. 3 star = up to 24.5, 4 star = 24.5 to 32.5, 5 star = 32.5 and above; current maximum = 37 points. For additional information, go to www.euroncap.com.

Chart I

Recalls are by calendar year rather than model year. A single recall may affect several vehicle lines and/or several model years. The same vehicle may have multiple recalls. (Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.) Two 2007 recalls, affecting over 4.8 million vehicles, are related to older technology components introduced in vehicles more than a decade ago.