skip navigation
Ford Sustainability Report 2006/7

Data Overview

Measuring Performance Against Our Business Principles

This table provides five-year performance data according to a set of key indicators. This table, the additional data and the performance sections of this report are all organized by Ford's Business Principles. The Business Principles guide our conduct and day-to-day decision-making in major areas of sustainability performance.

We have made some modifications to the table of indicators for this report. For our next report, we will conduct a full review of our sustainability indicators to ensure that they are aligned with our strategy and help to drive progress. We are also reviewing our indicators in light of the revised Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines.

This report covers the year 2006 and early 2007. The data are primarily for 2006 (for operations) and for the 2006 and 2007 model years (for vehicles). The data cover all of Ford Motor Company's wholly and majority-owned operations globally, unless otherwise noted. Changes in the basis for reporting or reclassifications of data previously reported are noted below.

This report is aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines released in October 2006, at a self-declared application level of A+. A complete index of GRI indicators is available here. More information on the Global Reporting Initiative and the application levels is available at www.globalreporting.org.

Products and CustomersEnvironmentCommunitySafetyQuality of RelationshipsFinancial Health
We will strive to earn the trust and respect of our investors, customers, dealers, employees, unions, business partners and society.
Indicators we report on 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Employee satisfaction, Pulse survey, overall, percent satisfied1 59 58 61 62 62
Overall dealer attitude, Ford, relative ranking on a scale of 1-100 percent (summer/winter score)2 58/61 64/67 67/69 70/72 70/64
Overall dealer attitude, Lincoln Mercury, relative ranking on a scale of 1-100 percent (summer/winter score)2 46/46 50/56 56/61 64/64 64/64
1

In 2006, the Pulse survey was changed to incorporate new dimensions. While there was no change to the number or content of the existing 55 core questions asked on Pulse, they were realigned into eight revised dimensions. These changes were made because the revised dimensions are: better focused on current business priorities; can be benchmarked externally – two revised dimensions (including the revised Employee Satisfaction Index) can be benchmarked externally, none of the prior 13 dimensions could be benchmarked outside the Company; provide a framework for more focused feedback and action planning.

2

Overall dealer attitude is measured by the National Automobile Dealer Association (NADA) Dealer Attitude Survey. Scores are for the summer and winter respectively of the year noted.