Sustainability Report 2006/7 - Environment - Data - Vehicle Fuel Economy and CO2 Emissions - Tables

A

Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – with FFVs

2007 is a preliminary estimate

Miles per gallon

	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
Cars (domestic and import)	27.9	27.9	27.0	28.6	28.5
Trucks	20.7	21.3	21.0	21.6	21.1
Combined car and truck fleet	23.2	23.6	22.8	24.1	23.8

See notes to the data

top

B

Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – without FFVs

2007 is a preliminary estimate

Miles per gallon

	2003	2004	2005	2006
Cars	27.2	26.5	27.8	27.7
Trucks	20.1	19.8	20.6	20.4
Combined	22.5	21.8	23.1	23.1

See notes to the data

top

C

Ford U.S. CO₂ Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – with FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO₂ Emissions)

2007 is a preliminary estimate

Grams per mile

	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007
	381	375	387	368	371	352

See notes to the data

top

D

Ford U.S. CO₂ Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – without FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO₂ Emissions)

2007 is a preliminary estimate
NA - Not available

Grams per mile

	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007
	NA	394	406	383	383	368

See notes to the data

top

E

European CO₂ Performance, Passenger Vehicles – Percent of 1995 Base

1995 base = 100 percent

Percent

	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
Ford	83	82	80	78	78
Jaguar	79	77	63	62	66
Land Rover	86	87	86	88	89
Volvo	88	91	89	87	86

See notes to the data

top

NOTES TO THE DATA

Table A and Table B

See the Climate Change and Environment sections for a discussion of our Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) performance. For 2006 model year. the CAFE of our cars and trucks declined 1.0 percent, as expected. Preliminary data for 2007 model year shows a 5.4 percent improvement in CAFE compared to 2006, with a 1.7 percent improvement for cars and a 5.2 percent improvement for trucks. Improvement is reflected by increasing miles per gallon. Due to a weight increase for the 2007 model year, the Econoline Vans were not part of the CAFE calculation.

Table C and Table D

See the Climate Change section for a discussion of our CO2 emissions performance. Improvement is reflected by decreasing grams per mile.

Table E

Official EU data. Jaguar performance did not improve compared to 2005 due to model mix. Land Rover performance did not improve compared to 2005 and 2004 due to model mix.

Vehicle Fuel Economy and CO2 Emissions

Tables on This Page

A

Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – with FFVs

B

Ford U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy – without FFVs

C

Ford U.S. CO2 Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – with FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO2 Emissions)

D

Ford U.S. CO2 Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – without FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO2 Emissions)

E

European CO2 Performance, Passenger Vehicles – Percent of 1995 Base

Ford U.S. CO₂ Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – with FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO₂ Emissions)

Ford U.S. CO₂ Tailpipe Emissions per Vehicle – without FFVs (Combined Car and Truck Fleet Average CO₂ Emissions)

European CO₂ Performance, Passenger Vehicles – Percent of 1995 Base